Beyond Science Wars Redux: Feminist Philosophy of Science as Trustworthy Science Criticism

Beyond Science Wars Redux: Feminist Philosophy of Science as Trustworthy Science Criticism

Academic Unit

College of Arts and Sciences

Publication Date

1-2019

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Bruno Latour is not the only scholar to reflect on his earlier contributions to science studies with some regret and resolve over climate skepticism and science denialism. Given the ascendency of merchants of doubt, should those who share Latour's concerns join the scientists they study in circling the wagons, or is there a productive role still for science studies to question and critique scientists and scientific institutions? I argue for the latter, looking to postpositivist feminist philosophy as exemplified by Alison Wylie and Lynn Nelson, among others, as a guide. Feminist philosophers of science who ground their analysis in a detailed understanding of scientific practice are not science's champions nor its antagonists, but they do stand in a distinct relationship to science. If not merchants of doubt, are they scientific gadflies or perhaps in scientific loyal opposition? Though these notions can underwrite useful approaches to science studies, neither captures the distinctive interdependency and interestedness of feminist philosophers and science. I suggest that we would be better served by the notion of trustworthy science criticism, building on the analyses of trust and trustworthiness by Annette Baier, among others, attendant to the dynamics of interdependency in trust relationships.

Journal Title

Hypatia

Volume

34

Issue

4

ISSN

0887-5367 /

Beginning Page Number

858

Last Page Number

868

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12500

Beyond Science Wars Redux: Feminist Philosophy of Science as Trustworthy Science Criticism

Share

COinS