Publication Date
Spring 2020
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts
Department
Communication and Training
First Advisor
Valerie Cronin-Fisher, Ph.D.
Second Advisor
Lara Stache, Ph.D.
Third Advisor
Jillian Klean-Zwilling, Ph.D.
Abstract
This study examined the discourses of miscarriages from the podcast narratives of women who have experienced miscarriage by utilizing Relational Dialectic Theory (RDT). The process of contrapuntal analysis identified the discourse of silence as the dominant miscarriage discourse in which the marginalized miscarriage discourse of silence as the dominant miscarriage discourse in which the marginalized miscarriage discourses of open and honest and fear and anxiety were counterpoint to. There were four interrelated themes of shame, lack of supportive and encouraging messages, lack of readily available information, and a communicated feeling that their circumstances could be worse that revealed the silence discourse within the women's stories. The Marginalized discourse of open and honest was supported by two interrelated themes of community and advocacy, and validation. The marginalized discourse of fear and anxiety was supported by themes doubt and insecurity and the triggers women experienced after having had a miscarriage. These competing discourses revealed many different nuances and avenues for future miscarriage and reproductive health communication in RDT research.
Recommended Citation
Lardino, Cherinicole, "Utilizing Relational Dialectics Theory to Identify Dominant and Marginalized Discourses in Women's Miscarriage Podcast Stories" (2020). All Student Theses and Dissertations. 126.
https://opus.govst.edu/theses/126